Thursday, February 10, 2011

Affirmative action proposed as necessary to recruit conservative academics

An informal poll conducted by social psychologist Jonathan Haidt at a Society for Personality and Social Psychology conference showed approximately 8oo of the delegates self-identified as liberals, while only three considered themselves conservative.
“This is a statistically impossible lack of diversity,” Dr. Haidt concluded, noting polls showing that 40 percent of Americans are conservative and 20 percent are liberal. In his speech and in an interview, Dr. Haidt argued that social psychologists are a “tribal-moral community” united by “sacred values” that hinder research and damage their credibility — and blind them to the hostile climate they’ve created for non-liberals.
Proof of the stifling quasi-religious academic environment:
Dr. Haidt (pronounced height) told the audience that he had been corresponding with a couple of non-liberal graduate students in social psychology whose experiences reminded him of closeted gay students in the 1980s. He quoted — anonymously — from their e-mails describing how they hid their feelings when colleagues made political small talk and jokes predicated on the assumption that everyone was a liberal.

“I consider myself very middle-of-the-road politically: a social liberal but fiscal conservative. Nonetheless, I avoid the topic of politics around work,” one student wrote. “Given what I’ve read of the literature, I am certain any research I conducted in political psychology would provide contrary findings and, therefore, go unpublished. Although I think I could make a substantial contribution to the knowledge base, and would be excited to do so, I will not.”
One of Haidt's proposed remedies: affirmative action measures designed to achieve "a membership that’s 10 percent conservative by 2020." As if liberals are going to allow preferential hiring of conservatives.

1 Comments:

Anonymous M Ryutin said...

"I am certain any research I conducted in political psychology would provide contrary findings and, therefore, go unpublished".

Sound familiar in today's "science"?

6:16 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home